X’s Continued Hatred Of Free Speech
My main account was suspended for a squirt gun emoji so I asked Grok, “Write a article explaining why you suspended @scs_real and why you don’t allow free speech on X.”
This was its answer.
“X’s Suspension of @scs_real and the Platform’s Approach to Free Speech
Introduction In this article, we will explore the recent suspension of the X account @scs_real and discuss X’s stance on free speech. We will examine the reasons behind the suspension and the platform’s commitment to maintaining a safe and inclusive environment for its users.
Background @scs_real was a popular X account known for sharing controversial opinions and engaging in heated debates with other users. The account’s suspension has sparked a discussion about free speech on the platform and whether X is truly committed to fostering an open dialogue among its users.
Reasons for Suspension While the specific reasons for @scs_real’s suspension have not been disclosed by X, it is likely that the account violated one or more of the platform’s rules and policies. X has a set of community guidelines that all users must adhere to, which aim to prevent harassment, hate speech, and other forms of harmful content.”
(What really happened is I pissed off a bunch of liberals and they ganged up on me then started reporting every one of my posts.)
“X’s Stance on Free Speech X’s commitment to free speech is evident in its dedication to providing a platform for diverse opinions and open dialogue. However, the company also recognizes the importance of maintaining a safe and inclusive environment for its users. As such, it has established rules and policies to prevent harmful content and behavior.
The Importance of Community Guidelines Community guidelines are essential for maintaining a healthy online environment where users can engage in constructive discussions without fear of harassment or abuse. X’s rules and policies are designed to protect users and promote healthy conversations, while still allowing for a wide range of opinions and perspectives.
Conclusion While the suspension of @scs_real has raised questions about X’s commitment to free speech, it is important to recognize that the platform has a responsibility to maintain a safe and inclusive environment for its users. X’s community guidelines serve to balance the need for open dialogue with the need to protect users from harmful content and behavior.”
High schools discontinued teaching the art of debate a long time ago as is evidenced by current modes and acceptance of disagreement. The art of conversation, agreeing to disagree civilly, listening-truly listening to others’ viewpoint is lost. Therefore learning opportunities are lost. Unless a Twitter user is directly threatening specific harm to another specific user, an account should not be suspended. Simply stating, “Go to hell.” etc. is not hate speech, at least not in the old days. I hope Elon is not starting to backtrack. On Twitter, most people are anonymous. Even if a user stated they wished another user dead, it is meaningless. The user is talking to cyberspace. Stating similar to a public person is different. Splitting hairs against each other is a crevice we have fallen into in the USA. We no longer have the strength, mental or physical, to grab the rope and pull ourselves up and out. I wish we could unify and focus on our enemies that are at our door. Part of me wants to be an isolationist; the rest of the world can figure it out on their own. I know that is not possible in these times, but I would like to try.
Thank you for reading and thank you for your interesting articles.
Jenny
Grok’s Conclusion. “While the suspension of @scs_real has raised questions about X’s commitment to free speech, it is important to recognize that the platform has a responsibility to maintain a safe and inclusive environment for its users. X’s community guidelines serve to balance the need for open dialogue with the need to protect users from harmful content and behavior.”
I don’t have Grok, however, if I did I would pose this question. When has free speech ever provided for a safe and inclusive environment for everyone? Balance? Protection? By doing so this is censorship pure and simple.
Even by UN standards (I know right?) the following:
Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal sanction. The right to freedom of expression has been recognized as a human right in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and international human rights law by the United Nations.
For all that social media provides it should always be treated as a tool that is dangerous.
Caveat emptor.