Examining Ballot Harvesting and Other Election Fraud

Examining Ballot Harvesting and Other Election Fraud

In recent years, there have been numerous allegations of election fraud and irregularities in the United States. One of the most contentious issues is the practice of ballot harvesting, which involves a third party collecting and delivering completed absentee or mail-in ballots. This paper will examine the practice of ballot harvesting, its legality, and other ways in which Democrats have been cheating at elections.

Ballot Harvesting: Legalities and Concerns

Ballot harvesting, also known as ballot collection, is a practice that has been implemented in some states. Currently, 27 states and the District of Columbia allow a third party to collect and deliver absentee or mail-in ballots. In some cases, these third parties are paid campaign workers or volunteers, which is concerning about coercion, fraud, or other forms of manipulation.

The practice leads to voter intimidation, as individuals are pressured to vote a certain way to appease the person collecting their ballot. Additionally, there are concerns about the security of the ballots during the collection process, as they are more susceptible to tampering or theft.

In some instances, ballot harvesting has been linked to election fraud. For example, in 2018, an investigation into North Carolina’s 9th Congressional District election uncovered evidence of ballot harvesting by a political operative. This led to the election results being overturned and a new election being held.

Other Allegations of Election Irregularities

In addition to ballot harvesting, there have been other allegations of election irregularities and fraud involving Democrats. These include:

• Voter registration fraud: This involves falsifying voter registration information or registering individuals who are not eligible to vote.
• Vote buying: This involves paying individuals to vote a certain way or offering incentives for voting.
• Voter impersonation: This involves an individual casting a vote on behalf of another person, either by using their name or by forging their signature on a ballot.
• Manipulating vote counts: This involves altering the number of votes cast for a particular candidate, either by tampering with voting machines or by altering the vote count during the tabulation process.

Conclusion

Ballot harvesting and other forms of election irregularities are complex issues that require further examination and discussion. While some states have implemented laws to regulate ballot collection, it remains a controversial practice that has been linked to instances of fraud and voter intimidation. It is important for lawmakers and election officials to ensure that the voting process is secure and transparent in order to maintain the integrity of elections and to prevent any potential for manipulation or fraud.

For more information;

• Legal Status: In places like Californiaand the District of Columbia, ballot harvesting is perfectly legal. However, critics argue that it opens the door to coercion, fraud, and manipulation of election outcomes.

• Coercion and Fraud: The ability to collect and handle multiple ballots gives party activists significant power. They can either coerce votersinto voting a certain way or engage in outright ballot theft and forgery. This practice undermines the principle of individual voting autonomy and raises concerns about the legitimacy of election results.

• The 2020 Election: The use of mail-in ballots and ballot harvesting techniques gained prominence during the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Organizations like the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL)distributed substantial grants to local election offices, often with strings attached. These grants aimed to encourage absentee voting and expand outreach efforts, but they also raised questions about partisan influence and fairness.

• Urban vs. Suburban/Rural Voters: Mass mail-in voting disproportionately empowers urban and university-based bloc voters. Meanwhile, conventional in-person voters in suburban and rural areas may see their votes diluted by a flood of absentee ballots from heavily Democratic cities and university towns. This dynamic fundamentally alters the electoral playing field.

Other Controversial Practices

Beyond ballot harvesting, other practices have also drawn scrutiny:

• Mail-In Voting: While mail-in voting provides convenience, it has been a focal point of voter fraud cases. Ensuring the security and accuracy of mail-in ballots remains a challenge.
• ZuckBucks: The Center for Tech and Civic Life’s $332 million COVID-19 Response Grant Program, colloquially known as “ZuckBucks,”aimed to gain control of election offices in critical areas. The funds were used to mobilize mail-in ballots, benefiting Democratic candidates. Critics argue that such large grants may compromise impartiality.

• False Claims: It’s essential to separate fact from fiction. Claims about dumping ballotsor widespread cheating should be scrutinized. In reality, elections involve complex dynamics, and allegations should be thoroughly investigated.